Document Type : Research Article


Associate Professor, Faculty of Law and Political Science, University of Tehran


Anthropology of the natural rights of man and its psychology can be compatible since the rights of man can be divided into two fixed and variable rights both of which play a shared role in the establishment of human rights and civil rights. But that part of human rights that finds meaning in social matters and is refined in the passage of time and change of place may not remain fixed and invariable and depending on its priorities in collective happiness, each society may prefer some elements over some others which cannot be necessarily generalized or experienced and may differ from one society to another. The only invariable element among these rights is fundamental human rights which can be restricted and limited under collective conditions. This forms the foundation of the theory of relativity in civil rights concerning natural rights of man.


Main Subjects

  1. BRAHAMI, Frédéric (2003). Introduction au Traité de la Nature humaine de Hume, Paris: PUF, coll. "Quadrige".
  2. DURKHEIM, Emile (1986). De la division du travail social, 11ème éd. , Quadrige 84, Paris: PUF.
  3. GROTIUS (1993).  Discours préliminaire, 17. cité par SERIAUX (Alain), Le droit naturel, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris.
  1. Hamid Allah, Mohammad (2002). International Conduct of the Islamic State, Trans. by Seyed Mostafa Mohaghegh Damad, Vol. 1, Islamic Science Publishing Center. [In Persian]
  2. Jafari Tabrizi, Mohammad Taghi (1998). The Story of Thoughts, An Introduction to Alfred North Whitehead, Tehran: Islamic Culture Publishing Office. [In Persian]
  3. Javadi Amoli, Abdol Allah (2003). The Relationship between Religion and the World, Qom: Esra. [In Persian]
  4. Javid, Mohammad Javad (2010). The Theory of Relativity in the Rights of Citizenship, Tehran: Gerayesh. [In Persian]
  5. Khomeini, Roh Allah (2001). Sahifeh Emam, Vol. 9, Third Edition, Tehran: Imam Khomeini Institute of Publishing and Publications of Imam Khomeini Works. [In Persian]
  6. LECOMTE, Jacques (1996). Regards multiples sur l’être humain, Sciences humaines n° 64, Aout-septembre.
  7. Mehrpoor, Hossein (2003). International System of Human Rights, Second Edition, Tehran: Etelaat Publication. [In Persian]
  8. Motahari, Morteza (1993). Women’s Rights system in Islam, Tehran: Sadra. [In Persian]
  9. Motahari, Morteza (1994). Divine justice, 7th Edition, Tehran: Sadra. [In Persian]
  1. HUME, David (1740). Traité de la nature humaine, Londres, Imprimé pour C. Borbet.
  1. KANT, Emmanuel (1963). Fondements de la métaphysique des mœurs, trad. Hatier, éd. Hatier, Paris.
  2. KELSEN, Hans; Théorie pure du droit, Trad. Thevenez, La Baconnière, Neuchâtel 1953, 2ème éd. 1988, Trad. Eisenmann, Dalloz, Paris 1962, réimp. 1989
  1. PETTIT, Philip (1998). Reworking sandel’s republicanism, Jurnal of philosophy.
  2. RAWLS, John (1971).  A Theory of Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  3. SANDEL, Michael J (1989). Moral Argument and Liberal Toleration: Abortion and Homosexuality, California Law Review, vol. 77.
  4. VILLEY, Michel (2006). La formation de la pensée juridique moderne, Paris: PUF.
  5. WEBER, Max (1996). Economie et Société, Traduction française, Plon: Paris.