نویسنده

معاون آکادمی علوم روسیه و مدیر موسسه قانونگذاری و حقوق تطبیقی دولت فدراسیون روسیه

چکیده

وحدت و همبستگی بین المللی بر بسیاری از جنبه‌های زندگی اجتماعی، از جمله توسعه سیستم‌های حقوقی ملی تاثیر می‌گذارد. این مقاله به تحلیل ساختارها و الگوریتم‌های تاثیرات متقابل سیستم‌های حقوقی ملی که منجر به شکل گیری ترکیب منحصر به فردی از رویه‌های مختلف حقوقی شده است، می‌پردازد. در این مقاله توجه ویژه ای به تاثیر حقوق بین الملل بر توسعه سیستم‌های قانونی تک تک کشورها شده است. نویسنده راه های غلبه بر تضادها و شکاف های موجود در سیستم چند بعدی مقررات قانونی در زمینه یکپارچه سازی روابط (اتحاد انجمن ها) با مشارکت فدراسیون روسیه و ایجاد رویکرد مفهومی در تشکیل چارچوب قانونی اتحادیه اقتصادی اوراسیا و حمایت جانبی برای توسعة این اتحادیه در قالب قوانین کشورهای عضو آن را پیشنهاد می‌کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Legal System of the Russian Federation Amid International Integration

نویسنده [English]

  • Taliya Yarullovna Khabrieva

Vice President of the Russian Academy of Sciences and Director of the Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation

چکیده [English]

International integration affects many sides of societal life, including the development of national legal systems. This article analyzes the regularities and algorithms of the mutual effect of national legal sys‌tems, which lead to the formation of unique compositions of various legal traditions. Special attention is paid to the influence of international law on the development of the legislative systems of individual countries. The author proposes ways of overcoming contradictions and gaps in the legal regulation of the multidimensional system of integration associations with the participation of the Russian Federation and substantiates conceptual approaches to the formation of the legal framework of the Eurasian Economic Union and subsidiary support for the union’s development within the legislations of the member states.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • No Keywords
  • No Key Words
  • No Key Word
  • No Keyword

1. Chambers, R. W. (2007). The Common Law (Aegypan, 2007).

2. George, T. E.  and Korobkin, R. (2012). Common Law Approach to Contracts (Aspen Casebooks, 2012).

3. Yu. A. Tikhomirov, Comparative Jurisprudence (Norma, Moscow, 1996) [in Russian].

4. V. D. Zor’kin, Law amid Global Changes (Norma, Mos­cow, 2013) [in Russian].

5. T. Ya. Khabrieva, “A law-governed state: Challenges of time and tasks of constitutional justice,” in Constitu­tional Control: A Doctrine and Practice: Proc. Int. Conf. Dedicated to the 20th Anniversary of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation (St. Petersburg, Octo­ber 28—29, 2011) (Norma, Moscow, 2012) [in Rus­sian].

6. G. F. Deiser, “The juristic person,” Univ. Pennsylvania Law Rev. Am. Law Register 57 (3) (1998).

7. B. Farrel, Habeas corpus in times of emergency: A historical and comparative view. http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&con- text=pilronline.

8. F. F. Martens, Contemporary International Law of Civi­lized Nations, 5th ed. (Tipographiya Ministerstva Putei Soobshcheniya, St. Petersburg, 1904), Vol. 1 [in Rus­sian].

9. A. Ya. Kapustin, “Globalization and integration in the Asia-Pacific region: A legal approach,” in Globaliza­tion and Integration Processes in the Asia—Pacific Region: Legal and Economic Problems, Ed. by T. Ya. Khabrieva (IZiSP, Moscow, 2014) [in Russian].

10. A. Ya. Kapustin, International Organizations in the Glo­balizing World (RUDN, Moscow, 2010) [in Russian].

11. E. I. Pivovar, Post-Soviet Space: Integration Alternatives: a Historical Essay (Aleteiya, St. Petersburg, 2009) [in Russian].

12. T. Ya. Khabrieva, Contemporary Problems of Ethnic Self­Determination: A Comparative Legal Study (Kontrakt, Moscow, 2011) [in Russian].

13. T. Ya. Khabrieva, National—Cultural Autonomy in the Russian Federation (Yustitsinform, Moscow, 2003) [in Russian].

14. International Law and National Legislation (Eksmo, Moscow, 2008) [in Russian].

15. Corruption: The Nature, Manifestations, Opposition, Ed. by T. Ya. Khabrieva (Yurisprudentsiya, Moscow, 2012) [in Russian].

16. M. Oesch, Standards of Review in WTO Dispute Resolu­tion (Oxford, 2004).

17. V. Zor’kin, “The limit of acquiescence,” Rossiiskaya Gazeta, Oct. 29 (2010).

18. Statement of the heads of states of the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic, the Russian Federation, and the Republic of Tajikistan on the establishment the Eurasian Economic Community of October 10, 2000. http:// www.evrazes.com/docs/view/94. Cited January 28, 2015.

19. N. G. Doronina, V. Yu. Luk’yanova, N. G. Semilyutina, and O. I. Tiunov, International Legal Aspects of Imple­menting the Interest of the Russian Federation Relative to the Formation of the Common Economic Space (IZiSP, Moscow, 2012) [in Russian].

20. S. E. Naryshkin and T. Ya. Khabrieva, “Toward new parliamentary dimension of Eurasian integration,” Zh. Ross. Prava, No. 8 (2012).

21. T. N. Neshataeva, “Eurasian court: Back to the future,” Zakon, No. 9 (2012).

22. T. Ya. Khabrieva, “Stages and main trends in the constitutionalization of contemporary Russian legislation,” Zh. Konstitutsionnogo Pravosudiya, No. 6 (2013).

CAPTCHA Image