The Public Domain and its Relation to the Constitution Law System of the Islamic Republic of Iran

Habibnezhad, Ahmad; Shirad, Omid

doi:10.22096/hr.2018.93060.1069

The Public Domain and its Relation to the Constitution Law System of the Islamic Republic of Iran

Document Type : Research Article

Authors

ahmad habibnezhad ¹

omid shirad ²

¹ Assistant Prof. at Farabi branch of Tehran University. Iran

² Assistant Prof. at Yazd University. Iran

10.22096/hr.2018.93060.1069

Abstract

The concept of the public domain is one of the concepts derived from the modern epistemic system, which is closely linked to the fundamental rights and freedoms of citizens, including freedom of speech, freedom of opinion, the right to engage citizens in the field of public affairs, and the right to organize, from the point of view of social science experts. The departure and the base for the realization of the people's religion are considered. Studies carried out in the spirit of expert thought, Jürgen Habermas, suggest that the acceptance of the relativity of facts and the ability to critique and change all the propositions are related to the social life, forms the essence of the theory of the public domain and the general discussion. Without any intention to rate the epistemic universe, the approach of writing suggests that the school system and the ideological nature of the political system, which are based on the various principles of the constitution, makes it impossible to fully reconcile the general sphere

Keywords

Public Domain

Public Discussion

Political System: Civil Society

Epistemic System

Subjects

Human Rights

A) Books & Journals
1. Abbasi, Bijan, (2014), Principles of Public Law, First Edition, Tehran, Dadgostar Publication.
2. Ashraf Nazari, Ali (2011), Modernity and Political Identity in Iran, First Edition, Tehran, Mizan Publication.
3. Azad, Taqi, Emami, (2004), Yahya, Genesis of the General Field and Rational Conversation, Case Study of Multiple Student Organizations, Iranian Journal of Sociology, Fifth Edition, pp. 58-89.
4. Bayat, Abdul Rasul et al. (2002), Dictionary of Culture, First Edition, Qom, Institute of Thought and Religious Culture.
5. Cohen, Jane, (2004), Public sphere, media and civil society, translated by Lida Kavousi, Resaneh Magazine, No. 59 pp. 45-68.
6. Dabirnia, Alireza; Asad-Abadi, Tayyebeh (2016), People's sovereignty in the political thought of the West and Islam, the "democratic system" and "the system based on sacred law in the fundamental Iranian law", the comparative research study of Islam and Western law, Vol 3, No 3.
7. Department of Legal Studies, Department of Legal and Presidential Affairs, Revision of the constitution, Theoretical Framework, (2004), Legal research information, No.7, pp. 7-16.
8. Detailed text of parliamentary negotiation, Final review of the constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran (1985), Volume 1, First Edition; Tehran, General Directorate of Cultural Affairs and Public Relations of the Islamic Consultative Assembly.
9. Gorji, Ali Akbar, (2009), In the defense of constitutional law, Second Edition, Tehran, Jangal Publication.
10. Gorji, Ali Akbar; Shirzad, Omid (2014), A reflection on the pluralism of the realization of democracy with reference to Iran, Fars Bar Association, No. 7.
11. Habermas, Jürgen (2006), Public sphere ,translated by Javad Kargozari, Public Law Quarterly Magazine, No. 2, pp. 42-47.
12. Habermas, Jurgen (2009), General Transformation of public sphere, translated by Jamal Mohammadi, Third Edition, Tehran, Afkaar Publication.
13. Habibnejad, Seyed Ahmad (2015), Collective Conscience of the Constituent Power of Moral Law, Special Issue of Religion and Law, No. 8.
14. Habibnejad, Seyed Ahmad (2016), Terms of impairment of rights and freedoms with emphasis on public order, Comparative Law Quarterly Journal (Mofid Letter), No. 105.
15. Habibnejad, Seyed Ahmad, (2011) The terms of the candidate's election in the Islamic Consultative Assembly in a comparative view, Journal of Political Science, Vol 14, No. 55.
16. Hashemi, Seyed Mohammad (1990), A comparative and thematic review of the constitutional review of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Journal of Legal Research, No. 8, pp. 151-228.
17. Hashemi, Seyed Mohammad (2005), Human Rights and Basic Freedom, First Edition, Tehran, Mizan Publication.
18. Haywood, Andrew (2010), Key words in public policy and law, Translated by Ardeshir Amir Arjomand and Seyed Bassem Molaei-zadeh, Second Edition, Tehran, Amir Kabir Publication.
19. Jahanbegloo, Ramin (1998), A Critique of Modern Wisdom: An Interview with Twenty Contemporary Philosophers, Translated by Hossein Sameyi, First Edition, Tehran, Forozan-e-Rooz Publication.
20. Karimi, Sarah (2013), Habermas from Critical Factor to Communication Wisdom, Journal of Social Science Development, No. 61, pp. 42-45.
21. Nobahar, Rahim (2008), Criminal law support from public and private areas, Tehran, Jangal Publication.
22. Nozari, Hossein Ali (2002), Reflection of Thoughts of Habermas, First Edition, Tehran, Cheshmeh Publication.
23. Rahmatollahi, Hossein (2009), Power Transformation, First Edition, Tehran, Mizan Publication.
24. Rahmatollahi, Hussein, Shirzad, Omid (2017), Perfectionism and Impartiality and its effects on the structure of power and public law, First Edition, Tehran, Majd Publication.
25. Rasekh, Mohammad (2007), Modernity and Religious Rights, Letter of law, No. 2, pp. 3- 26.
26. Taylor, Charles (1998), Creating a Civil Society, Strategic Studies Quarterly, translated by Massoud Sadeghi, No. 2, pp. 145-158.
27. Thompson, John (2002), Media and Modernity, Social Media Theory, Translated by Masoud O'Hadi, Tehran, First Edition, Soroush Publication.
28. White, Steven, (2001), Wisdom, Justice and Modernism, Recent Writings by Jürgen Habermas, Translated by Mohammad Hariri Akbari, First Edition, Tehran, Ghatreh Publication.
29. Yazdani, Abbas (2010), Religion and rationality in Max Weber's social philosophy, Marefat Quarterly Magazine, 19th issue, No. 157, pp. 93-106.