In my paper, I take as a specific example of the relationship between religion and human rights in the work of Jürgen Habermas, asking if there is any possible relationship between religion and the foundations of human rights. I argue that if we mean by human rights what has been taken from Jürgen Habermas’s recent work, then there can be little or no relationship between religion and human rights. Either religion can contribute little or nothing to the discussion of rights in multicultural societies, or another formulation for the origin of human rights must be found.
Abizadeh, Arash (2005). “In Defence of the Universalization Principle in Discourse Ethics,” The Philosophical Forum. Vol. 36, No. 2.
Benhabib, Seyla (1992). Situating the Self: Gender, Community, and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics, New York: Routledge.
Dillon, Matthew (1999). “The Authority of the Holy Revisited: Habermas, Religion, and Emancipatory Possibilities”, Sociological Theory. Vol. 17, No. 3.
Galen, P.F. (1962). “Freedom and Resentment”, Proceedings of the British Academy, Volume 48.
Gilabert, Pablo (2005). “Should Discourse Ethics Do Without A Principle of Universalization,” The Philosophical Forum. Vol. 36, No. 2.
Habermas, Jürgen (1984A). The Theory of Communicative Action: Volume I, Beacon Press: Boston.
Habermas, Jürgen (1984B). The Theory of Communicative Action: Volume II, Beacon Press: Boston.
Habermas, Jürgen (1990). Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action, Cambridge: MIT Press.
Habermas, Jürgen (1996). Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Habermas, Jürgen (2002). Religion and Rationality: Essays on Reason, God, and Modernity, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Habermas, Jürgen (2004). Der gespaltene Westen, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Habermas, Jürgen (2005). “Religion in the Public Sphere”, Lecture given at the University of San Diego. Available at: http://www.sandiego.edu/pdf/pdf_library/ habermaslecture031105_c939cceb2ab087bdfc6df291ec0fc3fa.pdf.
Heath, Joseph (2003). Communicative Action and Rational Choice, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kelly, Ute (2006). “Discourse Ethics and ‘the Rift of Speechlessness’: The Limits of Argumentation and Possible Future Directions”, Political Studies Review, Vol. 4.
Larmore, Charles, “The Moral Basis of Political Liberalism”, The Journal of Philosophy, 96:12.
McCarthy, Thomas (1978). The Critical Theory of Jürgen Habermas, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McCarthy, Thomas (1991). Ideals and Illusions: On Reconstruction and Deconstruction in Contemporary Critical Theory, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Nemoianu, Virgil (2006). “The Church and the Secular Establishment: A Philosophical Dialog between Joseph Ratzinger and Jürgen Habermas”, Logos, Vol. 9, No. 2.
Watt, A. J. (1975). “Transcendental Arguments and Moral Principles,” Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 40.